Cary G Dean.
An Orthodox Cancer Treatment Quiz
Question #4:
Question #4:
Among the thousands of scientific studies on chemotherapy, there is massive scientific evidence that chemotherapy extends the "total life" of cancer patients compared to those who refuse all treatment.
True or false?
Question #5:
Orthodox proponents claim that for some kinds of cancer, "cure rates" have gone up over the past 10 or 20 years. They claim this is just another proof that orthodox treatments are superior to alternative treatments.
Do you agree?
Do you agree?
Now the answers.
Question #4
Question #4: Among the thousands of scientific studies on chemotherapy, there is massive scientific evidence that chemotherapy extends the "total life" of cancer patients compared to those who refuse all treatment. True or false?
Answer:
The next quote answers this question:
The next quote answers this question:
Professor Hardin B. Jones, PhD stated:
"My studies have proved conclusively that untreated cancer victims live up to four times longer than treated individuals. If one has cancer and opts to do nothing at all, he will live longer and feel better than if he undergoes radiation, chemotherapy or surgery ..."
Prof Jones.
(1956 Transactions of the N.Y. Academy of Medical Sciences, vol 6)
see also:
Now consider this quote:
"In 1975, the respected British medical journal Lancet reported on a study which compared the effect on cancer patients of (1) a single chemotherapy, (2) multiple chemotherapy, and (3) no treatment at all. No treatment 'proved a significantly better policy for patients' survival and for quality of remaining life.'"
Barry Lynes, The Healing of Cancer - The Cures - the Cover-ups and the Solution Now! - page 9
And this quote:
"A German epidemiologist from the Heidelberg/Mannheim Tumor Clinic, Dr Ulrich Abel, has done a comprehensive review and analysis of every major study and clinical trial of chemotherapy ever done.
His conclusions should be read by anyone who is about to embark on the Chemo Express.
To make sure he had reviewed everything ever published on chemotherapy, Abel sent letters to over 350 medical centers around the world, asking them to send him anything they had published on the subject.
Abel researched thousands of articles: it is unlikely that anyone in the world knows more about chemotherapy than he.
His conclusions should be read by anyone who is about to embark on the Chemo Express.
To make sure he had reviewed everything ever published on chemotherapy, Abel sent letters to over 350 medical centers around the world, asking them to send him anything they had published on the subject.
Abel researched thousands of articles: it is unlikely that anyone in the world knows more about chemotherapy than he.
"The analysis took him several years, but the results are astounding:
Abel found that the overall worldwide success rate of chemotherapy was 'appalling' because there was simply no scientific evidence available anywhere that chemotherapy can 'extend in any appreciable way the lives of patients suffering from the most common organic cancers'.
Abel emphasizes that chemotherapy rarely can improve the quality of life.
He describes chemotherapy as 'a scientific wasteland' and states that at least 80 per cent of chemotherapy administered throughout the world is worthless and is akin to the 'emperor's new clothes', neither doctor nor patient is willing to give up on chemotherapy, even though there is no scientific evidence that it works!
(Lancet, 10 August 1991) No mainstream media even mentioned this comprehensive study:
It was totally buried.
Abel found that the overall worldwide success rate of chemotherapy was 'appalling' because there was simply no scientific evidence available anywhere that chemotherapy can 'extend in any appreciable way the lives of patients suffering from the most common organic cancers'.
Abel emphasizes that chemotherapy rarely can improve the quality of life.
He describes chemotherapy as 'a scientific wasteland' and states that at least 80 per cent of chemotherapy administered throughout the world is worthless and is akin to the 'emperor's new clothes', neither doctor nor patient is willing to give up on chemotherapy, even though there is no scientific evidence that it works!
(Lancet, 10 August 1991) No mainstream media even mentioned this comprehensive study:
It was totally buried.
Tim O'Shea, The Doctor Within
Three major studies all came to the same conclusion: "orthodox cancer treatments" do not extend the "total life" of cancer patients.
In fact, in many cases they shorten the "total life" of cancer patients.
In fact, in many cases they shorten the "total life" of cancer patients.
Here is a prophetic quote about the future of chemotherapy and radiation:
"Twenty years from now we will look back at chemotherapy and radiation as [being as] barbaric as using leeches,"
Steve Millett, manager of technology forecasts for Battelle
Question #5
Question #5: Orthodox proponents claim that for some kinds of cancer, "cure rates" have gone up over the past 10 or 20 years.
They claim this is just another proof that orthodox treatments are superior to alternative treatments.
Do you agree?
Answer:
Yes, some "cure rates" have gone up.
This is the most damaging deception of all.
Yes, some "cure rates" have gone up.
This is the most damaging deception of all.
Suppose Company B makes some small improvements in their engines and the "total life" of their engines increases from 100,000 miles to 102,000 miles.
Because of this, suppose the percentage of their engines that last 30,000 increases from 92% to 93%.
Because of this, suppose the percentage of their engines that last 30,000 increases from 92% to 93%.
Now imagine the CEO of Company B makes the following announcement:
"The percentage of our car engines that last 30,000 has increased from 92% to 93%. This proves that Company B cars last longer than Company G cars."
Is the CEO right? Of course not, Company G engines still last 300,000 and Company B engines only last 102,000.
It is an absurd claim.
What the Company B executive has done is compare the "old" Company B cars to the "new" Company B cars. The CEO has not compared the "total life" of the Company B cars to the "total life" of the Company G cars.
It is an absurd claim.
What the Company B executive has done is compare the "old" Company B cars to the "new" Company B cars. The CEO has not compared the "total life" of the Company B cars to the "total life" of the Company G cars.
That is exactly what the FDA does:
Compare how an "old" chemotherapy drug treats symptoms compared to how a "new" chemotherapy drug treats symptoms.
Compare how an "old" chemotherapy drug treats symptoms compared to how a "new" chemotherapy drug treats symptoms.
When orthodox medicine says that "cure rates" have gone up, they are comparing their "old" chemotherapy stats to their "new" chemotherapy stats - relative to treating symptoms.
They are not comparing the "total life" of orthodox treatments to the "total life" of alternative treatments or even the "total life" of those who refuse treatments.
They are not comparing the "total life" of orthodox treatments to the "total life" of alternative treatments or even the "total life" of those who refuse treatments.
Orthodox medicine is continually "improving" their treatments, all with a loud clarion blast of publicity.
Their cure rates are always "going up" and a cure is always "just around the corner".
" But look at it this way".
Company B can improve their engines to last 102,000, and 5 years later they can improve them to 104,000, and 5 years later to 106,000, and so on.
In the mean time people who bought cars from Company G have cars that last 300,000, then 5 years later 305,000, then 5 years later 310,000, and so on.
So when will Company B catch up to Company G?
NEVER!!
Their cure rates are always "going up" and a cure is always "just around the corner".
" But look at it this way".
Company B can improve their engines to last 102,000, and 5 years later they can improve them to 104,000, and 5 years later to 106,000, and so on.
In the mean time people who bought cars from Company G have cars that last 300,000, then 5 years later 305,000, then 5 years later 310,000, and so on.
So when will Company B catch up to Company G?
NEVER!!
But this sophisticated deception goes much deeper.
"Cure rates" will go up if the cancer is diagnosed earlier!
In other words, if the American Cancer Society convinces women to get mammograms (which are carcinogenic, by the way) more often, their breast cancer will be diagnosed earlier, on average, and the "cure rates" for breast cancer will go up!
The cure rate did not go up because of some improvement in chemotherapy or radiation, but because women have carcinogenic mammograms more frequently!
"Cure rates" will go up if the cancer is diagnosed earlier!
In other words, if the American Cancer Society convinces women to get mammograms (which are carcinogenic, by the way) more often, their breast cancer will be diagnosed earlier, on average, and the "cure rates" for breast cancer will go up!
The cure rate did not go up because of some improvement in chemotherapy or radiation, but because women have carcinogenic mammograms more frequently!
There are many ways to manipulate the "cure rates" of orthodox medicine.
My free, online eBook goes into this issue in much more detail.
My free, online eBook goes into this issue in much more detail.
In truth, the gap in "total life" between alternative cancer treatments and orthodox cancer treatments is greater than the gap between Company G cars and Company B cars.
The Cameron/Pauling study proved that.
But there are many alternative cancer treatments that have higher "total life" rates than Vitamin C therapy (based on current Vitamin C technology).
In fact I would not put Vitamin C therapy in the "Top 100" alternative cancer treatments.
The Cameron/Pauling study proved that.
But there are many alternative cancer treatments that have higher "total life" rates than Vitamin C therapy (based on current Vitamin C technology).
In fact I would not put Vitamin C therapy in the "Top 100" alternative cancer treatments.
Orthodox medicine, by using sophisticated definitions and deceptive statistics, has convinced the public to believe that orthodox cancer treatments extend the "total life" of patients.
But there is no scientific evidence for that belief!!
But there is no scientific evidence for that belief!!
I want to emphasize that these deceptions were not developed by ignorant people who didn't know what they were doing.
They are sophisticated, carefully designed statistical deceptions with carefully chosen terminology.
A normal person would automatically think only about "total life," but the "total life" numbers are carefully hidden.
More will be said about those doing the deception later in this seris of article's.
They are sophisticated, carefully designed statistical deceptions with carefully chosen terminology.
A normal person would automatically think only about "total life," but the "total life" numbers are carefully hidden.
More will be said about those doing the deception later in this seris of article's.
About the Author
-------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment